Clarence Thomas,Conflict of interest,Jan 6th insurrection
Thomas has ignored calls to recuse himself from Jan 6 insurrection related cases which his wife attended.
"Despite his wife’s backing of Donald Trump’s effort to subvert the 2020 presidential election, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has ignored calls to recuse himself from recent Jan. 6-related appeals." - MSNBC
Wife of Clarence Thomas says she attended Jan. 6 ‘Stop the Steal’ rally - The Hill
Ted Cruz questions Ketanji Brown about her willingness to recuse herself from a case involving her alma mater - but is OK with giving Clarence Thomas on having to recuse himself from cases involving the Jan 6th insurrection which his wife Ginni Thomas had involvement with. - Law and Crime
Use this relationship map to follow the lack of ethics at Robert's Supreme Court and the MAGA double-standard on justices recusing themselves when there is a conflict of interest.
Conflicted Ginni and Clarence Thomas
"Ginni Thomas has drawn outrage among liberals for public political commentary on her “Ginni Thomas” Facebook page. Her comments there celebrated Trump’s supporters who assembled in D.C. on Jan. 6, hundreds of whom stormed the Capitol, resulting in the deaths of five people. Thomas encouraged her Facebook followers to watch the day’s events unfold on conservative news media, writing, “LOVE MAGA people!!!!” - Washington Post
In response to a text from Mark Meadows encouraging her to keep fighting, Ginni Thomas replied: “Thank you!! Needed that! This plus a conversation with my best friend just now… I will try to keep holding on. America is worth it!” Who is Ginni Thomas’ “best friend?” Well, the Thomases regularly refer to each other as their own “best friend.” - HuffPost
TakeAway: Fix and restore honor to the Supreme Court. Vote for President Biden and Democrats.
Deepak
DemLabs
DISCLAIMER: ALTHOUGH THE DATA FOUND IN THIS BLOG AND INFOGRAPHIC HAS BEEN PRODUCED AND PROCESSED FROM SOURCES BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE, NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED CAN BE MADE REGARDING THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, LEGALITY OR RELIABILITY OF ANY SUCH INFORMATION. THIS DISCLAIMER APPLIES TO ANY USES OF THE INFORMATION WHETHER ISOLATED OR AGGREGATE USES THEREOF.
Subscribe to DemLabs Bulletin Donate to DemLabs
DemLabs applies innovative technology and storytelling tools in service of democratic values. It lowers the barrier of funding for worthy candidates and non-profits by applying existing free/affordable solutions.
I agree that Thomas is the poster child for corrupt behavior. Does it hace to be anymore blatant? Ginni compromises his position and her actions must be considered treasonous. Ginni didn’t suddenly toss down her apron and become a right wing operative, she cut her teeth on extremism with the John Birch Society then gained access through the Washington conspirators network.
Their marriage is also a political partnership. Clarence’s early Washington career demonstrated this eagerness to rise as high as he could. It wasn’t a very long road to the Supreme Court. Anita Hill did not lie. But Congress was’t going to let any woman “lynch” their chosen man. Had the committee actually reviewed her allocations Clarence Thomas wouldn’t be sittting
.